Perspective, The Tech Product Dilemma in a Multi-dimensional Shipping and Trade Ecosystem

By Sal Yazbeck
March 10, 2026

A closer look at why applying a path approach towards gaining a new level of perspective is vital for professionals, and the organization, in today's dynamic market.




In an earlier analysis, I introduced a view on how industry noise within the B2B cross-border shipping and trade data ecosystem can be a barrier for professionals in establishing a personal level of perspective. I also shared how following a deductive path can be helpful towards pursuing that end.

Here, I'll take a closer look at that path to highlight why this is increasingly important for professionals and the organization in today's dynamic market. Two contrasting industry examples are then offered for insight.

For starters, in the image below, I've zoomed in a bit on the deductive funnel to highlight two key areas: Baseline Foundation, and Context. The idea being that in an organizational setting, context comes after having first gained a shared foundational understanding. Let's have a look.





Baseline Foundation

In an effort to first tame the industry noise level, the focus at this stage is to try to de-complex the broad nature of this ecosystem. It is a process of applying structure to the industry by looking primarily at how to organize and align the markets and to identify interconnecting data flow patterns. It's an approach I refer to as gaining an "Ecosystem Foundation".

The challenge here for professionals is revealed by the evolving and cross-industry nature of the cross-border shipping and trade data ecosystem. It is multi-dimensional, in that it spans both the tech and business environment, while also being interconnected.

The outcome here: a general perspective on how the ecosystem is coming together, while simultaneously understanding that change is the name of the game. Attaining this baseline understanding is a vital first step, especially among a team in an organizational setting.

Context

Once a general ecosystem perspective is attained, the process continues to the next phase of what I call "Situation Clarity". Here, "context" is approached by first addressing the baseline perspective question, “what does it mean for me?” “Me” being the individual's business role, and more broadly, the organization.

Once addressed, the focus then turns to applying a relevant organizational context, whatever that may be. For instance, a realized market opportunity, or insight gained on solving for an existing organizational challenge. So, by addressing that question early, it helps in building the next steps in this phase towards gaining a new level of personal perspective.

However, take context without a shared foundation, and the conversation can feel a bit disjointed, where a connection to one foundation area by a team member may be lost on another. Decisions taken in such scenarios can create for a potential to, for instance, fall short of effectively addressing a needed or sought-out solution.

The basis of this view: following a process of gaining a shared baseline industry understanding, and then layering above it a narrowing context-based approach, can foster grounded business conversations among a team, which can then lead to a more personalized perspective, and then offer informed support for decision-making.

Industry Reflections, by Example

For clarity, consider the market complexity nature of the following two widely-covered examples:

A. The IoT device manufacturer in years past; and
B. The IoT device manufacturer of today.

1. This first example refers to a vertical transformation situation we’ve seen with the initial IoT device manufacturer dilemma, and viewed at that time as a potential business existential threat. This is where the business was faced with either to keep a legacy hardware sales approach, or transition to a new business model where the hardware device becomes the front-end of a new service-oriented data solution. The so-called hardware-as-a-service (HaaS) model - a new playbook at the time.
   
   
2. In the second example, and I’ll fast-forward to today’s international shipping and trade industry for contrast. Here, the complexity dynamics have understandably increased. It's where the device manufacturer is not only now operating within that service-oriented context, but also, when focused on cargo tracking, is operating well within an evolving cross-sector ecosystem. Focus a bit closer and add to that, if you will, the market of international perishable food trade, and you’ve now added another layer with a further regulatory angle.

Here, this increased complexity offers varying areas for consideration. For instance:

1. The customer’s business challenges can provide for context helpful in shaping product design/offerings;
2. Business activity is spread across a broad cross-market environment to follow when addressing the first point; and
3. New business opportunities within the ecosystem may go unnoticed without a foundational ecosystem understanding.

A takeaway here is that, if we look at products, the innovation dilemma in our second example is multiplied when compared to the first as now the nature of the ecosystem complexity has become multi-dimensional.

And in a multi-dimensional ecosystem, applying a path approach towards gaining a new level of perspective becomes vital to reducing the noise, simplifying decision-making, and applying solutions that reinforce company standing with customers.

#   #   #